Monday 23rd May - BIOTECH STRATEGY
|
| 08.00 | Registration and coffee
|
| |
|
| 08.50 | Chairperson’s opening remarks
|
| |
|
| REVIVING THE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY |
|
| 09.00 | Welcome address
|
| | Reinhard Glück, President of Swiss Biotech Association, & Chief Scientific Officer, Berna Biotech
|
| 09.15 | Keynote presentation: the future for biopharmaceuticals
- Why investment in early stage drugs must continue for a healthy biotech industry
- Can investors in biotech achieve their ROI in the expected timeframe?
|
| |
|
| 09.45 | Keynote presentation: political challenges facing the biotech industry
- The EMEA roadmap
- EU research programmes
- New cell and tissue legislation
- How biosimilars are being dealt with in Europe
|
| |
|
| 10.15 | Morning coffee
|
| |
|
| INNOVATIVE BUSINESS MODELS FOR BIOTECHS |
|
| 10.55 | Managing expansion of a biopharmaceutical development service provider
- Public: Private Partnerships
- Fund raising as a service business
- National Biomanufacturing Centre
|
| |
|
| 11.25 | Challenges and pitfalls in making your company successful
- How to prepare for unexpected turbulence,
- What key decisions you will need to make along the way
- How to avoid treacherous pitfalls
- Problems for European biotechs
|
| |
|
| 11.55 | Manufacturing as a critical component of value generation for biotech companies
- Outsourcing vs in-house production
- The Intercell model
- Why Scotland?
|
| |
|
| 12.25 | Lunch
|
| |
|
| 13.50 | Moderator’s opening remarks
|
| |
|
| 14.00 | Moderator's opening remarks
|
| |
|
| 14.10 | The flotation experience
- Why we floated
- What had to be done to get us ready for IPO
- What happened
- Lessons learned
|
| |
|
| 14.40 | The consequences of M&As on strategies for manufacturing biologicals
- How to make biologicals as a small biotech
- Buying vs making
- Key selling points when licensing out
- Adapting you manufacturing strategy as the company grows
- The Celltech model - could it work for you?
|
| | Bernard Chan, Head of Biologicals Manufacturing Development, UCB Celltech
|
| ALLIANCES, PARTNERING AND LICENSING |
|
| 15.00 | How does big pharma make up its mind about the value of L&A projects
- Use of different techniques in licensing deals and acquisitions
- Portfolio approach for the asssesment of L&A projects versus internal R&D projects
- Why current valuation tools do not always allow us to assess the 'go/no go' decision robustly
- Real option valuation to bridge the gap between 'conventional' valuation tools and strategic valuations
|
| |
|
| 15.10 | Afternoon tea
|
| |
|
| 15.45 | IP and partnering - the practicalities for biotechs
- Alliance/license strategies
- Issues determining an alliance structure
- Case study 1: contractual framework to include licenses, substance bulk supply, development services, etc
- Case study 2: co-venture agreement: co-promotion countries, co- marketing countries, single presence countries
|
| |
|
| 16.15 | Panel session: the pitfalls and challenges of alliances and licensing deals
- The interface between big pharma’s business development and biotech process development
- How to create a partnership where there is an acceptable valuation in terms of NPV
- Criteria for in-licensing and how it is changing
- What kind of results does big pharma look for term of pre-clinical tests?
|
| | Bernard Chan, Head of Biologicals Manufacturing Development, UCB Celltech
|
| 17.00 | Close of day one
|
| |
|
|
Tuesday 24th May - Stream One: BIOTECH PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
|
| 08.00 | Registration and coffee
|
| |
|
| 08.50 | Moderator’s opening remarks
|
| |
|
| ADDING VALUE IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT |
|
| 09.00 | Keynote presentation: key drivers in the production of biologicals
- Technical feasibility
- Regulatory compliance
- Key elements in the equation of clinical trial material supply
- Economic viability – can you extrapolate during early product development?
|
| |
|
| 09.30 | Time to market or time to innovate?
- New technologies offer improvements in costs and performance
- Benefits come at some risk of the unknown
- Procedures for evaluating and integrating new technologies to minimise risks to timelines
- Impact is greatest upstream, but improvements downstream are also required
|
| | Duncan Low, Distinguished Fellow, Process Development, Amgen
|
| 10.00 | Pre-clinical development strategies for protein products
- The scientific and regulatory issues that led to the adoption of the principles described in ICH S6
- Unique issues that must be considered in the design of biopharmaceutical development programmes
- Key considerations for the design of efficient strategies
|
| | James Green, Senior Vice President, Pre-clinical and Clinical Development Sciences, Biogen Idec
|
| 10.30 | Morning coffee
|
| |
|
| 11.15 | Employing product characterisation early in development to streamline pipeline progress
- Detailed physicochemical and biological characterisation early in product development for better understanding of the molecule (consistent with ICH Q6B)
- Identifying post-translational modifications to assist in developing an optimal process and relevant stability assays
- Early characterisation of product stability profile to assist with decision-making for candidate molecule
- Defining the site of structural changes for assessing whether the change is likely to have an impact on potency or safety
|
| |
|
| 11.45 | Panel session: developing a product with process development at the forefront of your agenda
- Definition of the company´s product development strategy with process in mind
- Requirements for early clinical trial material balanced with new process options
- Which investigations (CMC and non-clinical) are mandatory and which are optional?
- What is the real challenge between cost and quality during product development?
|
| | Duncan Low, Distinguished Fellow, Process Development, Amgen James Hope, Vice President, Operations, Bioprocessors Corp. James Green, Senior Vice President, Pre-clinical and Clinical Development Sciences, Biogen Idec
|
| 12.30 | Using high throughput automated microbioreactor systems to develop biopharmaceutical production processes
- High throughput automated microbioreactors
- Process optimisation
- Maximising return form process development resources
- Minimising time from clone to manufacturing and the clinic
|
| | James Hope, Vice President, Operations, Bioprocessors Corp.
|
| 13.00 | Lunch
|
| |
|
| GETTING THE REQUIRED EXPERTISE |
|
| 14.30 | Moderator’s opening remarks
|
| |
|
| 14.40 | The benefits and drawbacks of virtuality - what a small biotech needs to consider when outsourcing
- Degrees of virtuality – the benefits and the drawbacks
- What to outsource and what to keep in-house
- How to select a contractor
- Getting value for money – does low cost always mean high risk?
- Managing the process
|
| |
|
| 15.10 | Early stage manufacturing capacity – choices and considerations
- Defining the technology that fits your needs
- Choosing established or entrepreneurial technology
- Establishing the right commitment for contract activities
- Achieving success with concurrent development support
|
| |
|
| 15.40 | Speed networking
|
| |
|
| 16.40 | Afternoon tea
|
| |
|
| OUTSOURCING OPTIONS FOR BIOTECHS |
|
| 17.15 | What a small biotech needs to know when choosing contractors
- Who has the best regulatory expertise?
- Options for choosing cell line development for high yields
- The need to assess process development expertise, costs and service
- A discussion of the national centers and how they serve the SMEs
|
| |
|
| 17.45 | Sourcing from China and India – dream or reality?
- China and India emerging as major forces on the pharma outsourcing space
- Their traditional sales proposition revolving around low delivered prices
- The increasing number of pharmaceutical companies considering these countries as possible sources
- Assessing the risks associated with these countries against ultimate rewards achievable
|
| |
|
| 18.15 | Close of day two and boat trip on Lake Geneva
|
| |
|
|
Tuesday 24th May - Stream Two: BIOMANUFACTURING STRATEGIES
|
| 08.00 | Registration and coffee
|
| |
|
| 08.50 | Moderator’s opening remarks
|
| |
|
| BIOSIMILAR CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES |
|
| 09.00 | Methods of assessing immunogenicity of biosimilar products and their limitations
- The limitations of available assays for predicting immunogenicity of biologicals
- Available assays for measuring antibodies in patient sera
- Assays for characterising immune responses as part of unwanted immunogenicity assessment
- Animal models
|
| | Meenu Wadhwa, Leader,Cytokine and Growth Factor Group,Division Of Immunology and Endocrinology, NIBSC
|
| 09.30 | Immunogenicity issues in demonstrating comparability for biosimilar products
- Factors contributing to the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins
- Potential effects when a therapeutic protein is immunogenic
- Clinical example of immunogenicity
|
| |
|
| 10.00 | Comparability and biosimilars - science and regulations
- Examples of comparability
- Comparability intra and inter companies
- Impact of protein complexity
|
| | Inger Mollerup, Vice President, Pharmaceutical Development, Novo Nordisk
|
| 10.30 | Morning coffee
|
| |
|
| 11.15 | Panel session: exploring the challenges and opportunities inherent in the biosimilar marketplace
- A very young industry presenting difficulties for regulators
- Do generic firms focus too much on manufacturing rather than regulatory issues?
- The approval process as the key issue
- The likelihood of antibodies and more complex proteins being copied
- When will there be the first biogeneric launches?
|
| | Lincoln Tsang, Partner, Arnold and Porter, Chairman, Regulatory Affairs Advisory Committee, Bionindustry Association Linda Horton, Partner and Co-Chair, European Life Sciences Practice, Hogan & Hartson LLP, Brussels Inger Mollerup, Vice President, Pharmaceutical Development, Novo Nordisk
|
| 12.00 | Regulatory issues for data on biosimilar products
- The guideline on comparability of medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins
- Impact of Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
- Legal issues
- Framework for approval and policy issues
|
| | Lincoln Tsang, Partner, Arnold and Porter, Chairman, Regulatory Affairs Advisory Committee, Bionindustry Association
|
| 12.30 | Legal issues presented by biosimilar products in the US and Europe
- US-EU statutory recognition that biological medicines present special issues
- US regulatory framework and debate about “follow-on biologics” and “505(b)(2)”
- EU regulatory framework and its evolution: ambiguities and issues
- U.S.-EU quandary: about what data will be required?
- U.S.-EU issue: may a regulatory reviewer rely on a reference product’s data in reviewing biosimilar application?
- The innovator’s trade secrets?
|
| | Linda Horton, Partner and Co-Chair, European Life Sciences Practice, Hogan & Hartson LLP, Brussels
|
| 13.00 | Lunch
|
| |
|
| 14.30 | Moderator’s opening remarks
|
| |
|
| FUTURE PRODUCT OPPORTUNITIES |
|
| 14.40 | Keynote presentation: stem cell therapy – what are its prospects for eventual commercialisation?
- Pre-clinical and clinical progress to date
- How to transform the clinical development of stem cells into viable pharmaceutical products
- Latest advances in human stem cells, cord blood and bone marrow stem cells and expansion
- Scientific and legal issues surrounding embryonic stem cell research
- Expectations for future possible manufacturing of such products
|
| | Stephen Minger, Director, Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, King’s College, London
|
| 15.10 | GMP compliant separation of somatic cells for therapeutic use
- Technology
- Clinical and regulatory aspects
|
| |
|
| 15.40 | Speed networking
|
| |
|
| 16.40 | Afternoon tea
|
| |
|
| TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND PAT INITIATIVES |
|
| 17.15 | Technology tranfer to a green field site for biotech products - a comprehensive approach
- Design and design development
- Training and process familiarisation
- Organisational issues
- Tech transfer agreement and tech transfer plans
- Execution and data generation
- Filing strategies and project management
|
| | Brendan Hughes, Director, Development and Technical Services, Wyeth Medica Ireland BioPharma Campus
|
| 17.45 | Speed and quality by PAT and PIMS in bioprocess development
- Decreasing experimental duration (= throughput) by PAT and PIMS
- Increasing data reliability and reproducibility (= data quality) by PAT and PIMS
- Monitoring of biological process state variables and data density determine data quality
- Future application of PAT and PIMS for “parametric release” in biopharmaceuticals production
|
| | Jörg Schmidt, Head of Exploratory Pilot Plant, Novartis Pharma AG
|
| 18.15 | Close of day two and boat trip on Lake Geneva
|
| |
|
|
Wednesday 25th May - Stream One: BIOTECH: CLINICAL TRIALS, COMPLIANCE AND COMPARABILITY
|
| 08.00 | Registration and coffee
|
| |
|
| 08.15 | HyClone's breakfast briefing - Single-Use Stirred-Tank Bioreactor System.
The trend towards disposable processing systems in biopharmaceutical manufacturing continues, driven by the considerable economic and operational advantages of these systems. This presentation describes a single-use stirred-tank bioreactor system that has been developed by HyClone Laboratories, Inc., and Baxter Healthcare Corp. |
| | Kurt Kunas, Senior Research Scientist, Cell Culture Process Development, Baxter Healthcare Corporation
|
| 08.50 | Moderator’s opening remarks
|
| | Brendan Fish, Director, Bioprocess Sciences, Cambridge Antibody Technology
|
| THE CLINICAL TRIALS DIRECTIVE |
|
| 09.00 | Keynote presentation: the impact of the European Directive on clinical trials
- The implementation of Directive 2001/20/EC into EU Member State legislation
- The development of ethical review and an ethical framework for clinical research in Europe
- The impact of the Directive on the sponsoring and management of clinical trials
- The relationship between the Directive and clinical trials registries
|
| | Francis Crawley, Secretary General & Ethics Officer, European Forum for Good Clinical Practice
|
| 09.30 | The industry perspective: impact of the European Directive on clinical development
- Critical changes in the process from a European and global perspective
- Management of the transition period: national rules interpretation
- Redesign of the Phase IV strategy in Europe
- Multi-country, multi-center trials for rare diseases and cancer
- Lessons learned and areas for future clarification
|
| |
|
| 10.00 | Morning coffee
|
| |
|
| 10.45 | Adding value to early stage clinical development of biologics within the framework of the Directive
- Achieving quality criteria to enter clinical studies
- Achieving GMP requirements in early stage development
- Turning a hurdle into a benefit for product value
- Applying scientific advice
- Strategic approaches to the Clinical Trial Directive
|
| |
|
| 11.15 | Panel session: a discussion of how the Clinical Trials Directive is viewed under key European regulators
- Background to the implementation of The EU Directive
- The Directive and Good Clinical Practice
- The new clinical research environment created by the Directive
- Implications for clinical research
- Is there a problem with inconsistent implementation of the Directive across Europe?
|
| | Francis Crawley, Secretary General & Ethics Officer, European Forum for Good Clinical Practice
|
| QUALITY MANAGEMENT FOR CLINICAL TRIALS |
|
| 12.00 | The role of clinical quality management in 2005
- Key learnings from common audit findings
- Building the function and use of vendors for internal and external quality management
- Common misunderstandings in clinical quality management
- Identifying the added value of quality management
|
| |
|
| 12.30 | Lunch
|
| |
|
| COMPARABILITY CHALLENGES |
|
| 14.00 | Moderator’s opening remarks
|
| |
|
| 14.10 | Comparability of biologics: European regulatory perspective
- Examples of manufacturing changes
- The new guideline from CPMP
|
| | Kowid Ho, Pharmaceutical Assessor, Evaluation of Biological Products Department, AFSSAPS
|
| 14.40 | Perspectives on current FDA guidelines on comparability
- Strategies for comparability exercises
- A review of FDA and ICH guidelines for assessing product comparability: including characterisation, specifications and analytical methods
- Discussion of the ICH Q5S guideline
- How biosimilar products are influencing definitions of comparability
|
| | Christopher Joneckis, Senior Advisor for Chemistry Manufacturing & Control Issues, Office of the Center Director, CBER, FDA
|
| 15.10 | Achieving regulatory acceptable comparability studies
- Designing appropriate product characterisation studies
- Analytical, pre-clinical and clinical where necessary
- The need for process validation and process comparability
- Balancing resources by identifying critical parameters
|
| |
|
| 15.40 | Afternoon tea
|
| |
|
| 16.15 | Comparability testing of engineered antibodies
- Planning comparability: the easy part - why, what, how?
- Regulatory guidelines, analytical methods, the protocol
- Demonstrating comparability - the tricky part
- Case study – process changes during monoclonal antibody production.
- Conclusions
|
| | Brendan Fish, Director, Bioprocess Sciences, Cambridge Antibody Technology
|
| 16.45 | Global challenges in meeting post-approval regulatory requirements and ensuring an uninterrupted supply
- Is it a useful approach to defer development cost?
- Minimising the technical risk post-approval
- What is the experience within in the industry?
- What is the experience within the regulatory authorities?
|
| | Philipp Hess, President and Founder, Philipp Hess Associates
|
| 17.15 | Close of conference
|
| |
|
|
Wednesday 25th May - Stream Two: BIOMANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES
|
| 08.00 | Registration and coffee
|
| |
|
| 08.15 | HyClone's breakfast briefing - Single-Use Stirred-Tank Bioreactor System.
The trend towards disposable processing systems in biopharmaceutical manufacturing continues, driven by the considerable economic and operational advantages of these systems. This presentation describes a single-use stirred-tank bioreactor system that has been developed by HyClone Laboratories, Inc., and Baxter Healthcare Corp. |
| | Kurt Kunas, Senior Research Scientist, Cell Culture Process Development, Baxter Healthcare Corporation
|
| 08.50 | Moderator’s opening remarks
|
| |
|
| NOVEL CELL LINES AND EXPRESSION SYSTEMS |
|
| 09.00 | Case study: genetically engineered mammalian cells for high-level protein secretion
- Exploitation of the cell's secretory pathway through modified mRNA targeting
- Identification of specific targeting signals
- Up to 50 fold increased yields for naturally secreted proteins
- Efficient secretion of naturally intracellular proteins
- “Proof of concept" provided with various biomedically important proteins
|
| | Beate Stern, Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen
|
| 09.30 | Production of recombinant proteins in chicken eggs
- The egg as a bioreactor
- Characterisation of recombinant proteins produced in the egg white
- The importance of developing an alternative avian transgenic platform
- Production of transchromosomic chickens
|
| |
|
| 10.00 | Morning coffee
|
| |
|
| 10.45 | Panel session: challenges of production in transgenic systems
- Critical parameters related with the scale-up and the commercial manufacturing of biopharmaceuticals
- The biochemical properties of the product to be manufactured
- How assembly and post-translational modifications will affect decisions
- Production volume and costs for each system
- How to combat the regulatory issues associated with scale-up
|
| | Ulrich Steiner, Business Development Manager, Plant Made Pharmaceuticals, Bayer HealthCare Dan Couto, Director, rhSA Programme, GTC Biotherapeutics
|
| MANUFACTURING FACILITIES - CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS |
|
| 11.30 | How FDA’s new 21st century GMP initiative may influence your production and your future facility investment projects
- The outline of FDA’s and ISPE’s initiatives
- Increased focus on product and process understanding
- Using PAT as the driver to implement change
- Lean manufacturing and lean GMP
- Fast track engineering based on modular process concepts
- Upgrading your facilities in record time
|
| |
|
| 12.00 | Start-up and validation of a large-scale cell culture facility: strategies and experience
- Strategies for accelerated start-up and site approval
- Risk-based approach for process validation, with focus on upstream processing
- Process transfer from another site and comparability concept
- Rationale to establish comparable process and product
|
| | Thibaud Stoll, Head Manufacturing Huningue, Novartis Pharma S.A.S
|
| 12.30 | Lunch
|
| |
|
| 14.00 | Case study: Solvay’s vaccine manufacturing operation - benefits of disposable aseptic fluid transfer
- Solvay’s pioneering efforts for flu vaccine manufacturing
- Outline of Stedim’s disposable process initiatives, with particular emphasis on RAFT (Rapid Aseptic Fluid Transfer system)
- Explanation of how Solvay works with the RAFT system in final formulation & filling
- What lead to Solvay’s choice for installing the RAFT system?
- Installation, validation and regulatory approval of the system
- Economic model comparing the RAFT system with traditional hard piped systems
|
| |
|
| OVERCOMING BOTTLENECKS IN DOWNSTREAM PROCESSING |
|
| 14.30 | Moderator’s opening remarks - downstream processing alternatives
- Technologies and platforms in development
- Cost contributions and cost optimisation
- Constraints and restrictions in downstream processing
- A look at the future
|
| |
|
| 15.10 | From high dilution to high purity: technological challenges in downstream processing
- Process development with full pipelines and empty pockets
- Biomanufacturing: the current backlog in bioseparation
- Orthogonal biosafety concepts
- Disposable manufacturing and process economy
|
| | Uwe Gottschalk, Vice President, Purification Technologies, Sartorius AG--Biotechnology
|
| 15.40 | Afternoon tea
|
| |
|
| 16.15 | Downstream aspects of plant-made pharmaceutical manufacturing
- Handling large volume of dilute product in a speedy manner
|
| | Ulrich Steiner, Business Development Manager, Plant Made Pharmaceuticals, Bayer HealthCare
|
| 16.45 | Novel chromatography approaches and miniaturised process development for antibodies and recombinant proteins
- Looking beyond Protein A affinity chromatography for antibody purification
- Review of alternate methods and sorbents
- Application of mixed-mode ligands for capture of antibodies and other proteins
- Miniaturised “on-chip” chromatography process development approach
|
| | Sylvio Bengio, BioSepra Scientific Communications, Pall Life Sciences
|
| 17.15 | Trends in capture purification – the increasing use of affinity chromatography
- What does higher selectivity mean for downstream processing?
- Technologies for discovering process-suitable ligands
- Issues around media cost, column lifetime and ligand leaching
- Applications of diversity technologies
|
| | Steven Burton, Vice President, Research and Development, ProMetic Bioscience
|
| 17.45 | Close of conference
|
| |
|